Crazy about Japanese girls #2: Close quarters

mr peter says:

This will be the school in the Times Sq building then by the sound of it. Anything would be better than somshit school over the road. How much are the courses? I just bought the linguaphone course for £60 from a lady who bought it for her husband in UK-but him too lazy to learn. I expect I will be too, but having a load of giggling Jap girls around would be an incentive. What's the thai for bukake?-peter

Prorogue says:

This is very coincidental. The group of J girls I'm taking Thai lessons with were always going on about 'na rak David' and I never dreamed it was this sites correspondent.

I've learnt how to explain alliteration and Japanese Pussy Possy for my next class David. You'll be delighted to know that I've discovered a way to circumvent the 'how can I broach the topic of shagging you, while Salaryman Hubby is working his J Nuts off' without offending these placid girls lovely sensitivity.

Paradoxically they're quite a bunch of screamers in the sack and enjoy it when I yell 'Kamikaze' just before going down on them.

Bento Boy says:

Don't believe the shy giggling. If you put the hard word on a Japanese lovely and she smiles shyly and giggles, then go for it. They are very open about sex and don't have any of the hangups that western uglies do.

As for yelling in the sack. Hmmm, not in my experience Prorogue, I think you is fibbing mate.

Ronin says:

Don't know about yelling, but putting on a little schoolgirl-being-abused act, complete with bent index finger in their mouth for effect, has been more my experience with many of them. Also, some of the words they say come out like a parrot squawking, which can be pretty annoying. Otherwise, Japanese girls are great and blow Thai chicks away on certain levels. On the other hand, I've always scored the hottest Thai girls, so no complaints on either front here. Asian booty rules!

John U says:

Great way to learn Thai, but has anybody else recognised the photo as the winner and runner up in the 5th. annual All Japan Wanking Contest?

After a succesful wank the wanker has to hold up their wanking hand in the typical gesture shown in the picture. This is to ensure no cheating by holding in their hands some kind of tactile enhancer to highten the feeling of the wankee's member.

Points are given for the strength of the hard on, the speed to fruition, and the facial expression of both the wanker and wankee.

Previous contests have been won or lost on the facial expression only, as the wankees are chosen for the degree of difficulty in getting them to have a hard on, and the difficulty in bringing them to orgasm. Hence the expression "grinning like a wanking jap".

Alex O'Leary says:

Firstly, congratulations on a great site, David - highly entertaining.

Few contributors seem to attract as much of a response from others as John U. As a qualified psychologist I thought some people might be interested as to what makes John 'tick' - the majority probably don't care so should move on now.

John is a very bright guy. Reading his postings demonstrates this as he is articulate and constructs his arguments and ideas very constructively.

However, in the workplace John is an underachiever who hasn't reached his potential. The reason for this is that John's intelligence counts against him in this arena - he gets bored easily and does not respect colleagues and supervisors whom he considers to be his intellectual inferiors. Witness John's caustic put down of Tasty's minor grammatical error of a couple of days ago. In effect, John is saying that 'you don't have the right to judge me as you do not have my intelligence'. This explains why he has engaged in a mutually congratulatory relationship with Tanai Kwai whose large and flowery vacabulary has made a big impression on John.

However, this attitude does not go down well with his colleagues and particularly his supervisor who is likely to be a little nervous as to John's ability to 'pick holes' in what he regards as ridiculous management ideas. John will be regarded as a dangerous maverick. He will be in an administrative role, will maximise his holiday allowance and will leave work as early as possible. In short, John believes that his employer is lucky to have someone of his intelligence and will do no more than the minimum required.

Socially, John will have many acquaintances but few close friends. He has a quick, but somewhat cruel, wit. Thus, people will enjoy his company in groups but he is unlikely to socialise much with people on a one to one basis. John will be part of the 'crowd' at the pub and his presence will probably be greeted enthusastically when he turns up - however, people will not ring him directly with an invitation to go out as they will not want to ally themselves with him on a one to one basis. Likewise, when John goes on holiday it will be in groups rather than with one close friend.

John is something of a fantasist. Tasty was partially correct when talking about John's need to be liked by total strangers. However, it is more of an 'idol' complex as his postings demonstrate his contempt for most of the other people who post - who presumably are strangers. John idolises people like Stickman and David who do the things that he would like to do and feels that he has the ability to do. When his idol's star is in the descent, John can be vitriolic, as shown with his views about Stickman. This is because he feels personally let down by perceived slights from his idols and reacts more strongly than most. John does not necessarly appreciate that to many people, including the recipient, bringing a bottle of wine halfway across the world is an extreme gesture.

He would like nothing better to meet with David on his next visit to Thailand and will undoubtedly have contacted David regularly with personal e-mails. It should be stressed that John is not gay and that this is not sexual - it is more that David is the person that John would like to be.

Relationship wise, John is likely to be single - it is unlikely that females can match John's view of the type of partner that he can rightfully expect - the 'catch 22' is that such women are likely to be out of John's social and financial reach. When he does have a partner, his interaction with Stickman suggests that he will smother her with gifts and affection and thus she will feel that he is moving things on too quickly. Then, when he gets bored, he will become offhand and aloof.

Overall, John has no more foibles than most of us. He is a decent guy who wants to be liked - hence his need to respond personally to every posting about him and justify his actions. It is his own high level of intelligence that has been his own worst enemy and has led him to hide behind a veneer of arrogance. If he can eradicate this, he will become a more well balanced and likeable person.

(John - hope this helps. No charge).

Alex O'Leary

Joon says:

Hey guys-

So I got two Thai schools in Times Square: Pro Language and also Unity Thai. Which one has the J-girls in attendance? I was gonna learn Thai anyway and might as well shag a few chix at the same time.

Tks!

Godfrey Cox says:

I believe Mr. Jampton is correct.

There is a schizophrenic haunting this site.

He/she/it changes names constantly to post contributions, but is now claiming professional qualifications also.

It's getting a little boring Mr/Ms Schizo, please give it a rest.

Chopper Harris says:

Alex - thanks for the explainations concernings John U's personal make up. It all begins to make sense now. I was labouring under the misaprehension that John was just a cunt. Thanks to you I now see him in a different light. John is an intellegent cunt.

Prorogue says:

Alex

A lengthy post and fascinatingly, one which suggests you are presently going through an online obsessional phase. Particularly when constructing constuctively. I yearn for the time to see more of the posts you are referring to but as a quick psychological snapshot, have you thought about seeing a a therapist or sharing it with a group. I've found these to be highly effective methods in my experience. As objectivity is removed when analysing one's own head.

Fond felicitations

Pro.

Godfrey Cox says:

Nice one prorogue.

"Constructs constructively" (smile)

He must be the type of guy who "returns back" and "reverses backwards"

Billy Bremner says:

Blimey - are Prorogue and Coxy John U in disguise? It's always amazing when people put on postings about semantics whilst at the same time calling other people boring.

Just as well I'm dead. I'd hate to meet up with you 3 on a dark night.

Billy P. says:

Split personalities are your speciality Billy,LittleEyebrows,Sunglasses Ron,Concerned Reader, Rev. Paul Wicker,Lawro,Shack,Dick Headley, Alex Oleary and whoever else you may dredge up.

Yes, it's pretty obvious. You have an attitude which shines through all your postings.

If John U has the intelligence you credit him with he knows it too.

Rocky Rocastle says:

I agree with Billy P - bunch of schizo nutters (or 1 scizo nutter).

And Billy B - it's neither clever nor funny to impersonate dead footballers.

Max Langan says:

Cant work out which duller;

1. One person pretendig to be many different people.

2. lots of oter people telling the 1 person that they know.

I think a draw - pack it in the lot of you

shack says:

what about me you snidey littel fKr?

i would love it, love it if he pezzled you

shitpig
well done ALex, an eggsellent reading of our friend JOhn U

I was out with John teh other day, lovely geezer - never shy to give you a each around while you are conkers deep in his anus

shack says:

mind you - i wOuldn't shite in Tanai Kant's handbag

narky little faggot her

Seg says:

Maybe it's me, but I thought this thread was about nailing Japanese girls.

tommy caton says:

Seg boy, the great thing about a thread is that it can diversify and multiply - at least that's what my old mate Paul Vaessen told me the other day

TANAI KWAI says:

Shat writes...

"what about me you snidey littel fKr?"

You poor, lonely little dipshit. Okay, I'll party with you. First off, you are totally out of character.

"well done ALex, an eggsellent reading of our friend JOhn U"

Why suddenly such a gigantor pussy? You're supposed to be a crass, anti-intellectual take-no-prisoners, beat-my-penis-with-my-own-shoe hooligan-type. Dr. O'Leary's post, even John U. will concede, was imaginative and well-crafted.* That's like Kryptonite for imbeciles like you.

Instead of shitting all over it you pretended to read and understand it -- just to toss the good doctor's salad! You're weak. WEAK, I say!

"I was out with John teh other day, lovely geezer - never shy to give you a [r]each around while you are conkers deep in his anus"

Unless you've got two cocks how in fuck's sake would this even work?

(...)

[*Not a congratulatory comment.]

Billy P says:

Please, Please, Please, John U, Tanai Kwai, and all other posters to this site DO NOT RESPOND TO THE WHINGEING SCHIZO.

You all know it from it's attitude.

To respond to this strange being is to feed it.

If we all ignore it's whingeing ravings it will die of starvation.

ERNESTO ORTEGA says:

THOSE 2 JAPANESE WOMEN LOOK
VERY CUTE. THEY ARE PROBABLY
ON THE BEACH, DOING A PHOTO
SHOOT FOR SWIMSUITS. OR FOR
A CALENDAR, SOMETHING LIKE
THAT? I DON'T KNOW, TO ME
THEY LOOK LIKE RACING MODELS

John U says:

All this strange reaction involving me !!!

All I did was to try and give everybody a laugh. (weepy).

Have you no imagination?

Can't you see by the way they are holding up their cute little hands that they've just finished wanking off six grinning japs???

For fucks sake lighten up. Life is too short for such seriousness.

Ling says:

I only just found this site today, and spent the previous few hours reading through it. I know basically nothing about Thailand so pretty much everything you write is absolutely fascinating to me. I look forward to reading more about Thai people and culture on this site.

On another note, reading that psychological analsis of John U scared the hell out of me. Almost everything in that description applies to me, especially the bit about spending time in groups rather than one on one. I can't stop thinking about it now, it's just so on point, I feel violated >_<

Yoshinori Takeshita says:

John U is absolutely correct. The two Japanese lovelies are indeed the winnner and the runner-up in the 5th Annual All Japan Wanking Contest. However, I must correct him on one point: it is a widely held misconception in the West that the wankers hold up their wanking hands to " ensure no cheating by holding in their hands some kind of tactile enhancer to highten the feeling of the wankee's member". The hand gesture is, in fact, part of the ancient ritual by which the wanker displays her bushido or "wanking spirit". As a regular wankee at these events I just though I should set the record straight.

Johnny says:

Japanese chics are cool.

Talk about vocal in the bedroom, she was so loud that I could hear the neighbours with friends over next door start to raise their voices in conversation until the commotion was all over. Later I heard the neighbours friends say their goodbyes as they were leaving, one of them suggestively said "sweet dreams" and they all started laughing.

sniffer says:

Best description of a J-girl in the throes of passion came from my mate Jeg when a few of us were comparing notes
"Man, they sound like a dolphin having a heart attack"

Telemachus says:

Had a Japanese girlfriend for a year while working in Japan. Her name was Kaoru. I must say J girls are lovely, not nearly as messed up as people would have you believe. I was sick in Japan once and like all good Asian girls she nearly killed herself looking after me.

Great in the sack too!! They do do that look of pain expression while at it. It's very endearing, oh and that "eeeeeee" thing which means good in Japanese.

I was never so proud to hear a vowel in all my life!!!