September 11 2006
Bangkok Post attacks Mango Sauce

The Bangkok Post has falsely accused me of inciting a hate campaign against Guru journalist Lyle Walter. In an article published in Friday's Guru supplement, Narin Taylor claims that Mango Sauce contributors are guilty of "ganging up on a woman and a mother," hurling "lewd sexual insults" and sending "numerous hate mails" - allegations that are either completely untrue or, at best, greatly exaggerated.
Narin concludes that:
These people should be called a bunch of... what's the slang term for female dogs?
For having the temerity to suggest that one of Lyle's articles contained some implied criticism of farang men, I've been branded a "bitch" in a national newspaper - along with all the other Mango Sauce contributors who Narin also dismisses as "sheep."
Many readers will already be aware that "bitch" - when applied to a man - is the most offensive insult in the Thai language. It's the equivalent of calling someone a "cunt" in English and, quite frankly, I'm surprised that the Bangkok Post printed it.
By publishing Narin's letter, Lyle Walter's claims (on this site) of harbouring no animosity whatsoever towards farang men are acquiring a hollow ring. However, she shouldn't beat herself up about it because I've yet to meet a farang woman who doesn't feel exactly the same way for exactly the same reasons.
Let's examine Narin's bogus claims:
I have no doubt that she [Lyle] gets numerous hate mails from those who frequented that website [Mango Sauce].
I don't believe this poisonous allegation for one moment and Narin really shouldn't make such damaging claims about my website in a national newspaper without providing evidence. Perhaps Lyle could set the record straight by telling us exactly how many "hate mails" she's received from Mango Sauce readers.
My guess is none whatsoever.
To be accused of "ganging up on a woman and a mother" is a little unfair when, in reality, the "woman and mother" in question is a professional journalist with a weekly column the Kingdom's top English language newspaper. Narin's assertion that I'm picking on a weak target is laughable.
How can women expect to be taken seriously in the workplace if they fall back on the "boo hoo, I'm just a meek little girl" excuse whenever they're held to account.
Narin is an American of Thai origin so I don't understand how she reconciles her feminist beliefs with this portrayal of women as intrinsically weak and worthy only of our pity.
Wise women will save the "poor little me" pantomime exclusively for the divorce courts because, in any other context, it makes them look unprofessional. However, I'm not here to give a Women's Studies lecture.
Unlike the Bangkok Post, Mango Sauce gives its readers an immediate right to reply if they feel that I've been unfair or inaccurate.
Both Lyle and Narin exercised this right and appeared to enjoy doing so. Using wit and humour, they scored plenty of points but the banter that they engaged in so enthusiastically is now dismissed as "lewd sexual insults."
The whole thing is starting to sound like a cynical woman's attempt to swing a sexual misconduct tribunal back in good old Farangland.
Narin didn't elaborate so I'll recap:
Andy said:
Anybody got Lyle's phone number? She sounds like she needs a bit of empathy, or perhaps a companion who can take her out for a few drinks and a bit of witty repartee. Perhaps a few drinks, and then fish 'n chips at the Offshore, then maybe shag her over the rubbish bins round the back? I'm happy to help any tall white bird out; if she's up for it!
Lyle replied:
Andy, you've got a deal! See you by the bins, mate.
Lyle's reply is as tongue-in-cheek as Andy's cheeky offer and she gets full credit for maintaining her sense of humour.
Dick Renegade added:
She can lick my ass with Heinz tomato ketchup.
I don't know where Dick picked this up because it's a sexual practice that's generally only performed in prison - if the daddy of E-wing gives the nod. However, Lyle took the joke well enough to earn the respect of the group.
Happy weekend, everyone. May you not run out of Heinz tomato ketchup. Andy, see you at the Offshore.
>wink<
She didn't appear to be shocked or offended by any of this at the time but perhaps I'm being naive if I assume that a farang woman can take a joke without there being recriminations later.
The respect that Lyle and Narin earned with their feisty contributions to the forum is ebbing away fast.
Narin should bear in mind that false allegations of sexual misconduct can be extremely damaging. Every time a woman cries wolf it makes it harder for the real victims of sexual exploitation to be taken seriously.
Last week, Lyle fought her corner in so graciously that I conceded a point to her.
Hi Lyle
As you quite rightly point out, your article didn't label Western men with Thai wives and girlfriends as 'habitual sex tourists.' Excessive exposure to Fox News this week has clearly affected the balance of my mind.
If you run into me in one of the notorious "painter" bars I'll stand you a drink but I'm sorry to report that those diseased five-year-olds can never pour a decent pint.
Perhaps I'll get my long-overdue comeuppance in this week's Guru magazine (included with the Bangkok Post every Friday).
Right now, however, I'm still trying to figure out where the landlord's golden retriever has buried my "Barbie Doll" Thai girlfriend.
Regards
David
I was wrong to state that Lyle labelled Western men as habitual sex tourists because she merely implied it. However, I stand by all my other remarks because subsequent events have proved that my inferences about her mixed feelings towards farang men were absolutely bang-on.
Far from getting my comeuppance, Narin's clumsy attack in the Bangkok Post makes me feel completely vindicated.
When defending Lyle's article, Narin seems to be arguing that if you write something nasty about Western guys but then add something nice later on, this somehow cancels things out.
I don't agree.
If you call someone a sheep-shagger, it cuts little ice if you then go on to praise his nature conservancy efforts.
I can't find any more passages in Narin's attack that are worth quoting because, for the most part, she's "responding" to criticisms that I didn't actually make and, bizarrely, the specific points that I did make are almost completely ignored.
The questionable allegations concerning "lewd sexual insults" and "numerous hate mails" are just the icing on the cake.
Narin doesn't use a single quote from my article (perhaps because she can't find a damaging one) and, incredibly, she actually withholds the name of this website. The first question that Bangkok Post readers will ask themselves is "What website is this nutcase actually talking about?"
It's quite laughable, really.
By keeping her readers in the dark, Narin appears to be worried that they'll find Mango Sauce and draw their own conclusions.
In case I'm accused of misrepresentation, here's the article in full:
Oh, The Controversy
Dear readers, we interrupt The Savvy Lass's weekly column to bring you some boiling hot controversy!!! As you know, we a Guru like to stir up a bit of controversy - it's healthy for the mind and the soul. But THIS, we had no idea about this, and didn't even know of the existence of the culprit (a particular website) in this case. But this is one of the sauciest letters we'd ever read and felt it deserved to be published just for the saucy factor alone... ouch!!!
Dear Editor
I would like to bring your attention to the controversy over Lyle Walter's article "A white woman in Bangkok isn't like an Englishman in New York" published in Guru August 11-17 issue.
First let me say that I'm a Thai woman happily married to an expat.
The reason for this letter is that I have come across a website which quoted her article out of context and grossly misrepresented her point of view - for what reason and purpose I do not know.
But given the disparaging responses to the article on this particular website, with tens of individuals posting rude insults and derogatory comments - including lewd sexual insults - about Ms. Walter because of this misrepresentation, I felt that I should write you this letter in order to defend Ms. Walter. (And I have no doubt that she gets numerous hate mails from those who frequented that website).
For readers of this letter who have not read her article, her article was written from a farang woman's perspective about the role and place of a farang woman in Bangkok - which obviously is a reversal from what one would experience in the West - an angle which makes the article interesting.
There are two issues of controversy here, 1) Her comment about farang men and bar girls. 2) Her comment about being referred to as "sir" by Thais.
The website quoted her out of context, misrepresenting her as a bitter farang woman condemning farang men. This is the opposite of the truth.
Regarding farang men, she simply stated the FACT that in Bangkok, a large number of farang men (and obviously Thai men) prefer Thai women, leaving farang women feeling "invisible". It was simply a social observation, a general comment made without prejudice or judgement. It wasn't a complaint; it was the truth. And here's the exact quote that followed her observation:
"Or possibly the fellows may simply be going about their business while I'm just extra-sensitive about my undefined role in a metropolis teeming with the flesh trade. Wait, not "possibly"; make that a "definitely". I've definitely become extra-sensitive. The circumstances we've just examined seem to exacerbate my "invisibility" issues."
"Many Farang men are clearly here for work. But some "suits" by day - single or already attached - become sexpats by night. Honorable "suits", however, aim to date or sustain healthy relationships with Thai, Farang and other women, bless 'em."
So if you're not a sexpat, what's the problem? If you are, did she make any comment that is inaccurate? Or would you argue that being a sexpat is "honorable"? Yet, the website neglected this part of the article and misrepresented her opinion as a general insult to farang men. This could not be further from the truth.
Narin doesn't use a single quote from my article or reproduce any of the insensitively worded passages that I was commenting on (perhaps because they undermine her argument) so she's expecting Bangkok Post readers to give her the benefit of the doubt based on unsubstantiated claims. This style of argument carries little weight with intelligent people.
I can hardly believe that the ultra-evasive Narin has the gall to scold me for misrepresentation.
To be fair-minded, I can understand why the writer who butchered her article and many of his readers would be "overly sensitive" about any mentioning of the relationship between a number of farang men and bar girls. After all, this is a website splashed with advertisements such as "bar girl treasure hunt", "make a tit of yourself in a Thai go-go bar" and "secrets of Thai bar girl pay" - and many other web contents obviously revolve around this theme.
I believe that what goes on between consenting adults are their business and no one else's - I reserve no judgment. Farang men and bar girls, farang men and bar boys, farang men and soi dogs - it's nobody's business but theirs - I reserve no judgment. In fact, to be as fair as can be, this website has fun and interesting articles about Bangkok - and I have no problem with the site in general.
However, to misrepresent and quote out of context someone else's work, which led to an avalanche of ill-informed and unwarranted insults and rude comments is simply juvenile and downright pathetic.
In all my life I've never encountered such a bunch of whiny, overtly sensitive grown "men" - and I use the term "men" loosely here.
She said that there are farangs who come to Thailand only for sex. She simply stated a fact. There are loads of these people. Is anyone saying that this is not true? That there's no such thing as a sexpat? But she also said that there are farangs here working and looking to have healthy, sustained relationships. Is there anything wrong with this comment?
I never said that there was. Narin's argument would carry more weight if she criticised me for what I actually said rather than for the words she's put in my mouth.
And she's a woman who prefers to be referred to as a "miss" or "ma'am" rather than a "sir". What's wrong with that? Isn't that natural and logical? She's even so nice about it, admitting that the Thais who address her wrongly speak English better than she can speak Thai anyway. Here's my proof:
"I know, I know, it's nothing personal. The people who make the mistake are only trying to be polite and don't mean any harm (in fact they probably speak better English than I do Thai) - but considering the circumstances described above, some folks might empathize.
Is there anything wrong with the above comment? Certainly not to anyone with half a brain. Yet the website somehow managed to misrepresent it, and played it off as if she's insulting Thai people. Well, as a Thai woman, let me tell everyone, there's no insult here - it's just language mistake (sic) which she's trying to correct. So thank her for it.
For the record, my article didn't claim that Lyle insulted Thai people. Narin made this bit up.
I do not know Ms. Walter. But I too am a woman and a mother and someone who lives in Bangkok and loves Bangkok. Because of this, I truly sympathize with her. And so I take exception to what has been done to her article and to her person by this website.
I read all the insults and derogatory comments (lots of juvenile, lewd sexual innuendos) about a woman, one woman who simply stated some facts about the realities of Bangkok - and it disgusted me.
In reality, plenty of contributors took Lyle's side - at least to some degree - but Narin fails to acknowledge this and says that we're all "bitches."
What I want to ask the writer who did this butchered job and all his sheep is this: does it make you feel "manly" ganging up on a woman and mother? Does it make you feel proud of yourself to make such insults on a woman? Does it help you to hook up with more bar girls with farang men by misrepresenting Ms. Walter's article? Is it "manly" to hid (sic) behind anonymous Internet gimmicks and talk trash about real people?
If these people can whine and whine and whine about a woman not wanting to be referred to as "sir" - then perhaps these people should be called a bunch of... what's the slang term for female dogs?
Regards
Narin Taylor
In fact, no one "whined" about the "sir" thing except for Narin herself. Only four comments (out of 106) mentioned it. Two of them were supportive of Lyle and the other two merely placed the term in context.
Some of Narin's remarks are inaccurate and offensive but, because I too publish comments that don't reflect my personal views, I won't lay the blame at Lyle Walter's door.
She's just doing her job.
However, I hope that she drops by to distance herself from the ultra-offensive "bitches" remark directed at this forum - which includes a large number of contributors who were kind enough to support her.
I also hope that Lyle can confirm that the damaging "hate mail" allegations are false.
Footnote
This is the article that created all the fuss:
Western women who disappear in Bangkok
[Posted to About by David]
*** THE COMMENT FORUM IS NOW CLOSED ***
Previously
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
December 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003







Readers' comments
September 11, 2006 12:28 AM
September 11, 2006 12:36 AM
September 11, 2006 2:35 AM
September 11, 2006 3:48 AM
September 11, 2006 5:17 AM
September 11, 2006 6:28 AM
September 11, 2006 6:31 AM
September 11, 2006 8:36 AM
September 11, 2006 9:16 AM
September 11, 2006 9:22 AM
September 11, 2006 9:35 AM
September 11, 2006 11:02 AM
September 11, 2006 11:45 AM
September 11, 2006 12:16 PM
September 11, 2006 12:40 PM
September 11, 2006 1:08 PM
September 11, 2006 1:48 PM
September 11, 2006 2:13 PM
September 11, 2006 2:19 PM
September 11, 2006 2:21 PM
September 11, 2006 2:38 PM
September 11, 2006 2:42 PM
September 11, 2006 2:53 PM
September 11, 2006 3:11 PM
September 11, 2006 3:26 PM
September 11, 2006 3:39 PM
September 11, 2006 7:38 PM
September 11, 2006 8:03 PM
September 11, 2006 8:08 PM
September 11, 2006 8:44 PM
September 12, 2006 12:58 AM
September 12, 2006 5:33 AM
September 12, 2006 2:27 PM
September 12, 2006 8:45 PM
September 12, 2006 9:16 PM
September 12, 2006 9:17 PM
September 12, 2006 9:58 PM
September 12, 2006 10:10 PM
September 13, 2006 1:05 AM
September 13, 2006 1:50 AM
September 13, 2006 4:06 AM
September 13, 2006 7:31 AM
September 13, 2006 11:46 AM
September 13, 2006 11:54 AM
September 13, 2006 2:32 PM
September 13, 2006 4:41 PM
September 13, 2006 9:25 PM
September 13, 2006 9:43 PM
September 13, 2006 10:08 PM
September 13, 2006 10:18 PM
September 14, 2006 1:34 AM
September 14, 2006 4:30 AM
September 14, 2006 6:01 AM
September 14, 2006 6:12 AM
September 14, 2006 7:52 AM
September 14, 2006 2:24 PM
September 14, 2006 3:02 PM
September 14, 2006 10:09 PM
September 15, 2006 1:09 AM
September 15, 2006 5:24 AM
September 15, 2006 8:26 AM
September 15, 2006 4:21 PM
September 15, 2006 7:27 PM
September 15, 2006 8:34 PM
September 16, 2006 10:07 PM
September 17, 2006 11:36 AM
September 18, 2006 7:48 AM
September 18, 2006 5:14 PM
September 19, 2006 11:21 AM
September 19, 2006 12:22 PM
September 19, 2006 4:03 PM
September 19, 2006 5:28 PM
September 19, 2006 7:07 PM
September 19, 2006 7:35 PM
September 19, 2006 7:56 PM
September 19, 2006 10:07 PM
September 20, 2006 2:50 PM
September 20, 2006 10:12 PM
October 16, 2006 7:18 PM
October 18, 2006 6:48 AM
October 18, 2006 9:33 AM
October 18, 2006 2:31 PM
October 18, 2006 8:45 PM
October 19, 2006 4:30 AM
January 11, 2007 3:28 AM
January 11, 2007 5:36 AM
January 11, 2007 5:51 AM
June 6, 2007 8:43 AM